| GEF ID: | 5150 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Focal Areas: | Climate Change | ||||||||||||||||||
| Country(ies): | Chile | ||||||||||||||||||
| Geograpic scope: | National | ||||||||||||||||||
| Project Description: |
I. Summary of the national energy situation
Chile has an installed capacity of approximately 17 000 MW: 74% is in the Central Interconnected System, (SIC), 25% in the Norte Grande Interconnected System (SING), and less than 1% in medium-sized systems in Aysen and Magellan Regions. Taking into account the expected growth trend until 2020, it is projected to increase in electricity consumption around 7% per year. This represents the challenge of incorporating 8 000 MW of installed capacity in the country. Today the power matrix is composed of 3% share of NCRE, 34% hydropower and 63% of thermal generation.
Currently the Ministry of Energy is developing an Action Plan for Energy Efficiency up to 2020 which will provide the detailed guidance to achieve the goal of reducing energy waste in the country. The Government of Chile began in 2005 the implementation of actions to increase energy efficiency with the creation of the National Programme on Energy Efficiency, this effort was institutionalized in early 2010 with the creation of the Division of Energy Efficiency at the Ministry of Energy focused on policy development, and the Chilean Energy Efficiency Agency (AChEE), focused on implementation of policies.
II. Summary of the national efficient lighting situation in Chile
The Government of Chile is promoting the transition to efficient lighting as a pillar of its Energy Efficiency Strategy. As noted above, the National Energy Strategy identifies as a priority area the development of Minimum Energy Efficiency Performance Standards (MEPS) and supporting policies to encourage efficient lighting, in this sense, the actions have been implemented are:
Regulatory Mechanisms
The Ministry of Energy of Chile has the power to issue MEPS since the publication in the national gazette (June 2012). The Ministry of Energy expects that with the support of GEF and UNEP the country will define and adopt national standards for efficient lighting products (including CFLs and LEDs and other products to be identified as appropriate).
Supporting Policies
Mandatory energy efficiency labeling for incandescent lamps, compact fluorescent lamps and fluorescent tubes are in place since 2007 (Specification PE Num. 05/06/2). As a result Chilean consumers can find the energy efficiency label the products listed; this is a way to deliver clear and reliable information on the efficiency and performance of lighting products.
From 2007 to date the Ministry of Energy has spearheaded campaigns disseminating information on the proper use of energy, the campaigns highlight the use of energy efficiency labels and advice for individuals to make them chose efficient light bulbs.
Between 2008 and 2009 the Government of Chile carried out a program to replace inefficient incandescent bulbs with CFLs which distributed nearly three million CFLs in vulnerable sectors of the population under the programme “Iluminate con Buena Energia”. This action helped to disseminate and increase awareness on this efficient technology in the country.
Monitoring, Verification and Enforcement
The Superintendencia de Electricidad y Combustibles is responsible for overseeing regular control and testing in accredited private laboratories for those products following the national labeling scheme (incandescent lamps and CFLs).
Environmentally Sound Management of Lighting Products
Chile’s environmental intents for this project are threefold:
1) To reduce the greenhouse gas and hazardous heavy metal emissions from fossil fuel combustion that is related to electricity generated for lighting; 2) To ensure that efficient lighting technologies contain minimal amounts of hazardous materials; and, 3) That at end of useful life, lighting hardware is collected, treated and adequately managed, so that it has minimal solid waste impact, preventing also exposure risks to health and the environment.
It is expected that the ministries of Energy and Environment work closely in order to develop activities along these lines.
So far, there have been discussions at the national level to develop a national legislation for electronic waste (therefore including lighting products), though the future of this legislation is uncertain at this stage. In addition some private sector companies have undertaken communication activities for consumers on the treatment of used mercury added lamps. This issue constitutes an important priority for the Ministry of the Environment.
In light of the commitment of Chile’s government to promote energy efficient lighting, the country joined the UNEP en.lighten initiative in 2012 and was selected as one of its seven pilot projects worldwide. In this context and under the leadership of the Ministry of Energy and the technical support of the en.lighten initiative Chile is currently completing a National Efficient Lighting Strategy leading to the progressive phase-out of inefficient incandescent lamps following a country-led approach. The strategy is setting national objectives and a detailed roadmap to phase-out inefficient incandescent lamps. Activities include:
· Identifying national phase-out and efficient lighting objectives. · Establishing national mandatory lighting MEPS, based on global best practice, accepted international standards and Chile conditions. · Creating policy support mechanisms such as: economic and financial incentives and tools, information and awareness raising campaigns and other market-based actions. · Devising a national quality control mechanism to ensure compliance with the lighting MEPS · Designing an environmentally sound management scheme with a robust legal framework · Creating a locally appropriate communication, information and awareness raising campaign · Establishing roles, responsibilities and an achievable timeline for implementing the strategy. · Considering how to best finance the strategy to address initial costs and to measure and capture long-term economic benefits
Chile’s strategy is being developed in consultation with the relevant national public and private stakeholders following a participatory, multi-stakeholder process. Chile is being supported via existing en.lighten methodology and guidance. The en.lighten global Centre of Excellence with its network of efficient lighting experts supports Chile officials and stakeholders in assessing the most appropriate channels to ensure the transition. en.lighten’s online support center will help to strengthen Chile’s capacities by delivering targeted information, technical webinars and training videos.
III. Summary benefits of the transition to energy efficient lighting
Under this Project, the transition to efficient lighting in the residential, commercial/industrial and outdoor sectors would result in expected environmental benefits of 1.20 million tonnes annual CO2 reduction directly. Annual energy savings in terms of reduced electricity consumption would be 2.80 TWh, which is 4.81% of total national electricity consumption and 34.4% of electricity consumption used for lighting. The annual costs savings in terms of avoided electricity bills and lamp costs would be about 486 million USD.
With the phase out of only inefficient incandescent lamps, the environmental benefits would be 0.679 million tonnes annual CO2 reduction directly. Annual energy savings in terms of reduced electricity consumption would be 1.59 TWh. The annual costs savings in terms of avoided electricity bills and lamp costs would be about 320 million USD.
B. 2. Incremental /Additional cost reasoning: describe the incremental (GEF Trust Fund/NPIF) or additional (LDCF/SCCF) activities requested for GEF/LDCF/SCCF/NPIF financing and the associated global environmental benefits (GEF Trust Fund/NPIF) or associated adaptation benefits (LDCF/SCCF) to be delivered by the project:
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Lead Executing Agency: | URC (UNEP Risoe Centre ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Project Type: | FSP | ||||||||||||||||||
| PPG/PDF Grant: | $ 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
| PPG Confinancing: | $ 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Project Grant: | $ 2,485,713.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Project Confinancing: | $ 9,419,843.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Project Status
| PIF: | PIF Submission Date 2013/02/12 | |
| GEF Approval Date 2013/03/08 | Document | |
| PPG: | GEF Approval Date 2013/03/28 | Document |
| UNEP Approval Date 2013/10/23 | ||
| Completion Date Unspecified | ||
| Project: | Expected CEO Approval Date Unspecified | |
| Project Submission To GEF 2015/06/24 | ||
| CEO Approval Date 2015/07/14 | Document | |
| UNEP Approval Date Unspecified | ||
| Completion Date Unspecified | No Document | |

